Procurement of paddy and wheat highest ever in 2020-21
- Press Information Bureau
- August 2, 2021
The Union Minister of State for Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution, Ms. Sadhvi Niranjan Jyoti in a written reply to a question in Rajya Sabha today informed that Government of India has procured 869.29 LMT of paddy during KMS 2020-21 and 433.32 LMT of wheat during RMS 2021-22, which is the highest ever procurement.
Some state governments have also recorded highest ever procurement of foodgrains during current year.
Wheat: Punjab, Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan, Uttrakhand, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh and Jammu & Kashmir have recorded highest ever procurement during RMS 2021-22.
Paddy: Punjab, Bihar, Gujarat, Telangana, Jharkhand, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Odisha, Tamil Nadu, Uttrakhand and Uttar Pradesh have recorded highest ever procurement during KMS 2020-21.
Coarsegrain: The State Government of Gujarat, Haryana, Karnataka, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra and Uttar Pradesh have recorded highest procurement during 2020-21 as compared to procurement during last five years.
|
PROCUREMENT OF WHEAT AND VALUE AT MSP |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
Procurement figures are in LMT , Rs in Crore (as on 20.07.2021) |
||||
|
SL No |
STATES/ UTs |
RMS 2019-20 |
RMS 2020-21 |
RMS 2021-22 |
||||
|
Procurement |
MSP Value (Rs 1840/Qtl) |
Procurement |
MSP Value (Rs 1925/Qtl) |
Procurement |
MSP (Rs 1975/Qtl) |
|||
|
1 |
Punjab |
129.12 |
23758.08 |
127.14 |
24474.45 |
132.10 |
26089.75 |
|
|
2 |
Haryana |
93.20 |
17148.80 |
74.00 |
14245.00 |
84.93 |
16773.68 |
|
|
3 |
Uttar Pradesh |
37.00 |
6808.00 |
35.77 |
6885.73 |
56.41 |
11140.98 |
|
|
4 |
Madhya Pradesh |
67.25 |
12374.00 |
129.42 |
24913.35 |
128.16 |
25311.60 |
|
|
5 |
Bihar |
0.03 |
5.52 |
0.05 |
9.63 |
4.56 |
900.60 |
|
|
6 |
Rajasthan |
14.11 |
2596.24 |
22.25 |
4283.13 |
23.40 |
4621.50 |
|
|
7 |
Uttrakhand |
0.42 |
77.28 |
0.38 |
73.15 |
1.44 |
284.40 |
|
|
8 |
Chandigarh |
0.13 |
23.92 |
0.11 |
21.18 |
0.17 |
33.58 |
|
|
9 |
Delhi |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.06 |
11.85 |
|
|
10 |
Gujarat |
0.05 |
9.20 |
0.77 |
148.23 |
1.71 |
337.73 |
|
|
11 |
Jharkhand |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
|
12 |
Maharashtra |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.01 |
1.98 |
|
|
13 |
Himachal Pradesh |
0.01 |
1.84 |
0.03 |
5.78 |
0.13 |
25.68 |
|
|
14 |
Jammu & Kashmir |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.24 |
47.40 |
|
|
15 |
West Bengal |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
|
TOTAL |
341.32 |
62802.88 |
389.92 |
75059.60 |
433.32 |
85580.70 |
||
|
STATEMENT SHOWING STATE WISE PADDY PROCUREMENT & VALUE AT MSP |
||||||
|
|
|
Procurement Fig. in LMT , MSP in Rs. Crore (as on 20.07.2021) |
||||
|
STATES |
KMS 2019-20 |
KMS 2020-21 |
KMS 2021-22 |
|||
|
Procurement |
MSP Value (Rs 1835/Qtl) |
Procurement |
MSP Value (Rs 1888/Qtl) |
Procurement |
MSP Value (Rs 1960/Qtl) |
|
|
ANDHRA PRADESH |
82.58 |
15153.43 |
82.60 |
15594.88 |
NIL |
|
|
TELANGANA |
111.26 |
20416.21 |
141.01 |
26622.69 |
||
|
ASSAM |
3.15 |
578.03 |
1.88 |
354.94 |
||
|
BIHAR |
20.02 |
3673.67 |
35.59 |
6719.39 |
||
|
CHANDIGARH |
0.22 |
40.37 |
0.28 |
52.86 |
||
|
CHHATISGARH |
74.86 |
13736.81 |
59.35 |
11205.28 |
||
|
GUJARAT |
0.21 |
38.54 |
1.10 |
207.68 |
||
|
HARYANA |
64.28 |
11795.38 |
56.55 |
10676.64 |
||
|
HIMACHAL PRADESH |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
||
|
JHARKHAND |
3.80 |
697.30 |
6.28 |
1185.66 |
||
|
JAMMU & KASHMIR |
0.15 |
27.53 |
0.38 |
71.74 |
||
|
KARNATAKA |
0.61 |
111.94 |
2.06 |
388.93 |
||
|
KERALA |
7.10 |
1302.85 |
7.65 |
1444.32 |
||
|
MADHYA PRADESH |
25.97 |
4765.50 |
37.27 |
7036.58 |
||
|
MAHARASHTRA |
17.42 |
3196.57 |
18.19 |
3434.27 |
||
|
ODISHA |
70.57 |
12949.60 |
77.38 |
14609.34 |
||
|
PUNJAB |
162.33 |
29787.56 |
202.82 |
38292.42 |
||
|
NEF (Tripura) |
0.21 |
38.54 |
0.22 |
41.54 |
||
|
TAMIL NADU |
32.41 |
5947.24 |
37.93 |
7161.18 |
||
|
UTTAR PRADESH |
56.57 |
10380.60 |
66.84 |
12619.39 |
||
|
UTTRAKHAND |
10.18 |
1868.03 |
10.62 |
2005.06 |
||
|
WEST BENGAL |
27.03 |
4960.01 |
23.29 |
4397.15 |
||
|
TOTAL |
770.93 |
141465.66 |
869.29 |
164121.95 |
||
|
PROCUREMENT OF COARSEGRAINS AND VALUE AT MSP
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As on 20.07.2021 |
|
|
|
KMS |
COMMODITY |
GUJARAT |
HARYANA |
KARNATAKA |
MADHYA PRADESH |
MAHARASHTRA |
UTTAR PRADESH |
TOTAL PROCUREMENT (In MT) |
MSP Value (Rs. In Lakh) |
|
JOWAR (Kharif) |
0 |
0 |
838 |
5469 |
1468 |
0 |
7775 |
1998 |
|
|
JOWAR (Rabi) |
0 |
0 |
8418 |
0 |
7145 |
0 |
15563 |
4000 |
|
|
BAJRA |
0 |
100000 |
0 |
76 |
0 |
0 |
100076 |
20015 |
|
|
MAIZE (Kharif) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
19 |
25 |
44 |
8 |
|
|
MAIZE (Rabi) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
115094 |
0 |
115094 |
20257 |
|
|
RAGI |
0 |
0 |
193243 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
193243 |
60872 |
|
|
Total |
0 |
100000 |
202499 |
5545 |
123726 |
25 |
431795 |
107149 |
|
|
2020-21 |
JOWAR(Kharif) |
0 |
0 |
80722 |
29582 |
17784 |
0 |
128088 |
33815 |
|
JOWAR(Rabi) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7696 |
0 |
7696 |
2032 |
|
|
BAJRA |
11515 |
150000 |
0 |
195351 |
5005 |
0 |
361871 |
77802 |
|
|
MAIZE(Kharif) |
4133 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
88283 |
106413 |
198829 |
36783 |
|
|
MAIZE(Rabi) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6199 |
0 |
6199 |
1147 |
|
|
RAGI |
0 |
0 |
474098 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
474098 |
156215 |
|
|
Total |
15648 |
150000 |
554820 |
224933 |
124967 |
106413 |
1176781 |
307795 |
|
|
2021-22 |
|
Nil |
|||||||
|
Procurement of Pulses under Price Stabilisation Fund (PSF)Scheme(as on 22.07.2021) |
||||
|
Year |
Pulses |
STATE |
QUANTITY PROCURED (IN MT) |
VALUE (IN Rs. CRORE) |
|
2019-20 |
Tur Kharif 2019 |
Telangana |
88,281.14 |
512.03 |
|
Karnataka |
77,196.75 |
447.74 |
||
|
Andhra Pradesh |
11,085.05 |
64.29 |
||
|
Gujarat |
6,132.64 |
35.57 |
||
|
Total |
1,82,695.57 |
1,059.63 |
||
|
Masoor |
Madhya Pradesh |
92.97 |
0.50 |
|
|
Total |
92.97 |
0.50 |
||
|
2021-22 |
Masoor Rabi 2021 |
Madhya Pradesh |
15,323.61 |
95.41 |
|
Uttar Pradesh |
7,064.69 |
43.77 |
||
|
Bihar |
47.48 |
0.32 |
||
|
West Bengal |
122.00 |
0.80 |
||
|
Total |
22,557.77 |
140.30 |
||
|
Moong |
Madhya Pradesh |
63,824.75 |
459.28 |
|
|
Total |
63,824.75 |
459.28 |
||
|
Source: Department of Consumer Affairs |
||||
Disclaimer: This information has been collected through secondary research and IBEF is not responsible for any errors in the same.
Partners
